What's your media philosophy?

It’s easy to believe that owned and earned media (aka social media) is superior to the older paid media. We’ve been trained over the past 15 years of the GUI web to think this way. Anyone who regularly reads this blog knows my thoughts on traditional media, in that it is dying, or at the very least changing.

So what is the right media? The media that achieves the objective, within the budget constraints, and lastly fits the risk profile of the media investor.

Sure, it may be cheaper to vlog, blog and tweet ourselves to functional levels of brand awareness – especially in startup land. But it may be a smarter option to invest 1 million dollars advertising on TV if it results in 3 million dollars in revenue. I say this because I think entrepreneurs are being blinded by the zero cost nature of digital media. What we are better off embracing is an objective driven, performance based approach. This is especially true now that the lines between old and new media are blurring.

The best advice I can give is this:  ‘don’t discriminate’ – don’t even think of digital as a channel. Instead think of making connections with audiences. Sometimes this may involve traditional media, sometimes exclusively digital, and sometimes only one or the other. Instead, think in terms of ‘Human Movement’. That is, what they do, where they are and how the communicate with them. Essentially we need to integrate our thinking into how ‘they’ (the people we want to have a conversation with) move. The important caveat is that we need need to be nimble enough to develop an understanding of new media channels as they emerge.

twitter-follow-me13

Youtube rewind 2010

I promise this will be the last year in review video I post. But I do think it is relevant to all entrepreneurs and marketers to be across what people are watching. The one caveat that I’d place on anything which makes a hit list or a top ‘anything’ list for that matter is this:

When anything reaches a certain level of critical mass, the fact that it made it onto the agenda drives a large part of the subsequent popularity.

In the case of Youtube, the videos that make it to the most popular for the day, often make it to the weekly list… and so on. We end up watching, because people are watching. Not because it is actually worth watching. A few excellent pieces make it anyway – like the Old Spice commercial. You can check out the Youtube top 10 for 2010 here: http://www.youtube.com/rewind And the summary video is below. Enjoy.

 

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUzLhHH7gHg]

twitter-follow-me13

Year in review – Google Style

It’s interesting how technology changes the way we interact. In fact, the way we do a year in review is also changing as Google show here with their Zeitgeist 2010 video. I’m sure there is something in this for everyone, not just retrospectively, but the type of stuff that will matter in our business prospectively.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0QXB5pw2qE]

twitter-follow-me13

The end of the Wild Wild West? (www)

You can probably remember back to a time when websites were tagged on advertising or with addresses in their full glory

http://www.xyz.com

It then became www.xyz.com followed closely by xyz.com In the early phase of the web had to direct people to our sites overtly in our communications. We had to spell out exactly where to go. This evolved further to the phrase ‘Google us’ which is the modern version of ‘Find us in the yellow pages’. And the most recent iteration we are seeing is the Social Network, aka Facebook becoming the directory of choice.  Many brand advertisements are now are using Facebook as their sign off:

facebook.com/brandxyz

More recently ‘there’s an App for that’ and the success of the itunes / app store platform is doing the same thing in smart phones and mobile devices.

Is this start of the the end of the open web, the Wild Wild West (www)?

Are we moving back to controlled media channels where we have to play in other organisations spaces?

Is this what we really wanted? Or is it just the natural evolution when there is just too much information available? It feels a little like we’ve let other people take control to remove the clutter in our life. We’ve stopped leading and started following. It makes me wonder if there is a limit to the number of information channels we can follow. If Dunbar’s number tells us how many meaningful relationships we can have, is their a media channel equivalent? It feels like there should be. It scares me to think controlled media is making a very big comeback – sure we generate the content, but we don’t own the forums. I just hope this latest iteration of the web is temporal and it doesn’t stifle the great period of innovation we are currently experiencing. The thing all entrepreneurs need to remember is that the the barriers to any digital innovation have never been lower, and no business is all powerful.

twitter-follow-me13

The truth about small fish

When starting out or chasing new customers on an existing business it makes sense aim for smaller players first, to build confidence, and get a few small wins on the board…. right?

The problem with thinking like this is that it makes life harder and less profitable.

The truth about small fish, is that they are harder to catch than big fish. They’re more elusive than the big guys and are often much harder to convince to invest their money in whatever we are selling. With the small fish the decision is often about whether they should invest their money or not. The advantage of the big fish, is that the investment funds are usually allocated, it’s more a question of doing business with company A or company B. From a  revenue perspective it’s far wiser investment of time to court a customer whose decisions to invest are already made.  A $10,000 customer is harder to get than a $1,000,000 one.

The other factor worth considering is our reputation. If we become successful selling to the small players, we’ll be seen as a small solution provider.  But if we land a big one it gives us a license to knock on other big doors. When the investment is time, its worth chasing the bigger reward, and the truth is that it’s often an easier sell job.

twitter-follow-me13

The infrastructure disadvantage

I was really excited to read about the new Eday hatch electric car which will be launched in 2012. It’s very cool for a few reasons including: It’s price is under $10,000. It’s an Australian startup. They are IT focused, not automotive focused. All the major functions are controlled electronically. It’s also the first eco / electric car option which isn’t priced at a premium, so it’s a total game changer.

What I find most interesting in the article is the advantage of zero infrastructure. When industries go through significant change as the automotive industry is, existing infrastructure can be a major disadvantage. Not only can it define how things should be made, but it also has the added burden of it needing to be supported financially. It demands asset utilisation and so limits the potential for a real change in product output.

The only way to innovate in an industry is to re-imagine the best way to build something from scratch. To ignore what we know about the incumbent mode of operation and create a new one. It is examples like the Eday that should inspire entrepreneurs to believe that that no company or industry is all powerful.

twitter-follow-me13

Visual Orgy – Retail

This is an amazing piece of creative work from H&M at a new retail store launch in Amsterdam. Check it out below.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2W6Eabefezg]

The same theme shines through again. Creativity wins. The production costs are clearly much less that the creative input. I wonder what other startup brands could use the visual projection idea to make something worth sharing on the web?

twitter-follow-me13