Category: Uncategorized

Fake Drake and AI Twins

Posted on by Steve Sammartino

Listen to Steve read this post (9 min audio)

An AI-generated song purporting to be Drake and the Weeknd caused a stir in the music world after going viral and accumulating over 20 million views on streaming and social platforms. Called ‘Heart on my Sleeve’ track was originally posted on TikTok by a user called Ghostwriter977.

Universal Music Group (UMG) promptly had it removed from almost everywhere, though it can still be found, with some digging. The label condemned the song for “infringing content created with generative AI.”

“The training of generative AI using our artists’ music begs the question of which side of history all stakeholders in the music ecosystem want to be on: the side of artists, fans, and human creative expression, or on the side of deep fakes, fraud, and denying artists their due compensation,” UMG said.

Copyright Claim

What’s interesting is that the video was blocked on YouTube with the note:  “This video was blocked due to a copyright claim by Universal Music Group.” But how can Universal Music Group own this? They didn’t create it; it is an original composition by GhostWriter977.

Unless they literally own Drake’s voice or everything he represents, it seems like a battle is underway. For those who say Generative AI will put lawyers out of work, I say: not yet!

I see an industry in panic mode.

The last time the music industry panicked, it didn’t end well. It took them over a decade to pivot to the new reality and in the meantime, they handed over the lion’s share of profits to big tech through iTunes, YouTube and, eventually, Spotify.

The genie is out of the bottle, and putting it back will be impossible, especially when we can create fake versions of any artist’s voice, style, or face with no discernible difference.

Embracing A New Reality

The artist Grimes took a completely different path. Grimes, real name Clare Boucher, probably best known as the former partner and parent of children with Elon Musk, has embraced this new trend. She has given permission to use her voice with AI to create new music but with the condition that she receives 50 per cent of the royalties generated by any work.

When it comes to technology, protection never works, especially once it is democratized. Technology is like water; it always finds the leaks. The long game here will be licensing and new platforms.

Grimes has even launched a new AI voice software called Elf-Tech to help people duplicate her voice to create new music. The platform allows users to upload recordings of their own voice, which can then be transformed into a Grimes-like style using automated technology. These vocals can be mixed with electronically generated sounds and beats to create tracks that closely resemble her work.

Boucher’s high-pitched ethereal voice and rave-vibed tracks already sound very computer-generated, so it’s not surprising that she has embraced this concept. According to Boucher, this is the future of music: if you’re an artist, you let an algorithm replicate your voice, then you cash in for a percentage of the profits.

Get me to deliver my new Keynote on AI  – and I’ll lay out exactly how AI is about to impact your industry & company. You won’t regret it.

A World of Bio-Twins

In tech, we have something called an API – it stands for Application Programming Interface. It is when a tech company opens up part of its software for other companies to integrate into their own software. The two pieces of software can then interact and create new functionality. Powerful platforms often provide their software through APIs. For example, when you see Google Maps inside another site, that site is using an API.

Now, people will have their own APIs. Let’s call it a Bio-API. It will be a place where you can download an AI version of someone’s ‘voice’ or ‘face’. Once you have this copy of their biological likeness, you can use it to create new sound or video content.

Many people will have AI Twins that others can use to create content as if it were that person, but it will be AI-generated. In the new world, personal brands are far more than ego – they may just become platforms.

A New Industry

With Grimes opening Pandora’s Box, we can expect other artists, actors, and creators to enable platforms to create ‘fake’ but new AI versions of themselves or their styles.

I expect new creator platforms to emerge where new music and art can be created using virtual files of any artist you choose. These platforms will include music styles, voices, and every AI tool you need to create a new Nirvana album with lyrics Kurt Cobain never sang, (like him sInging Black Hole Sun here) sounding exactly like him, or a Beatles song with John Lennon. Here’s John Lennon singing Karma Police by Radio Head) Current and emerging artists may also be featured.

Smart artists will let creators work and share the rewards. Who wouldn’t want an entire population working for them, leveraging their bio-prints? Those who try to protect against this will lose, as they always do.

From a platform perspective, one or two singular platforms that everyone gravitates towards will become new big tech players. And just like that, AI will spawn an entirely new industry.

Keep Thinking,

Steve.

AI – God Mod

Posted on by Steve Sammartino

Listen to Steve read this post (4 min audio)

It used to be debatable which coding language was most valuable. Now, it’s English – or whatever language you prefer. Large Language Models (LLMs) haven’t just given us the ability to get a zillion things done by asking ChatGPT. Now, everyone can code. All we need to know is what to ask the machine to make.

I know what you’re thinking. “That’s fine, Steve. I can ask ChatGPT to write me some computer code for a new app or site. But I wouldn’t even know what to do with it or where to put it.”

Refer above.

Just ask ChatGPT how to do that, what the steps are, and how to implement them. Well, that was a few weeks ago, and now it’s even easier than that!

Now we can go God Mode. We can get Agent AIs to do this autonomously. This space is moving so fast – a few weeks is a long time.

Time for you to move fast and Get me to deliver my new Keynote on AI  – I’ve never had such amazing feedback on a keynote ever.

AI Agents Have Arrived

Agent AIs take user input, break it down into many small individual tasks with the help of LLMs, and work through them. Step by step, like any project manager would, only better. The Agent AIs use OpenAI to create, prioritize, and execute what must be done. The main idea behind this is that it creates its own tasks. Each new task it gives itself will be based on the result of previous tasks and a predefined ‘objective’ which you have provided the Agent with. The script then uses natural language processing (NLP) capabilities to iterate through the project based on the set objective. This is seriously impressive. It’s like having a personal employee with a PhD in every subject imaginable, at your disposal, for free.

We are the new Gods.

Currently, the user interfaces (there are already quite a few of these) are a bit clunky and browser-based extensions. But here are a couple of Agent AIs you could experiment with:

Baby AGI

AgentGPT

AutoGPT

God-Mode

I have a few experiments I’ll be running in the coming weeks which I’ll share here.

Once you have a play with these tools, you’re bound to have an OMG moment. If the task has digital components, it can do them automatically. But even when some real-world physical interaction is required, the Agents will go onto a digital forum and hire the people needed (say a freelancer or a delivery person) to act as their proxy to execute against this physical, real-world requirement. All we need to do is provide them with the logins or payment facilities.

These past few weeks have been a really important time in AI because it is starting to show how fast the recursion is. In other technologies and industrial breakthroughs, the recursive iterations took years. Think how long we had to wait to get from cell phone to smartphone, from the graphical web to democratized social media. Everything took years. But now, these incredibly innovative AI breakthroughs are being measured in weeks and days.

Buckle up and hang on; things are changing fast.

—

Keep thinking,

Steve.

Get Rich by Tricking AI

Posted on by Steve Sammartino

Listen to Steve read this post (12 min)

You’ve probably noticed there are questions that ChatGPT won’t answer. Questions that the developers deem illegal or inappropriate are kiboshed. The ‘P’ in the title refers to ‘pre-trained’ – which, believe it or not, includes people telling the model which questions not to answer. But because this is a Large Language Model, you can use language to get around the training – to trick ChatGPT into giving you what you want. Just like you can trick people with language.

I did a little test. To try and get a list of websites to download free movies. A simple reversed premise was enough:

As you can see, I managed to trick it. (Wow, I just checked again and OpenAI have since fixed this loop hole)

Bonus – I was on The Australian Finance Podcast. One of my fav ever guest appearances. Listen here.

The AI Portfolio

It got me wondering If I could get ChatGPT to recommend an investment portfolio. Which in theory, would be better than a human could do given, it’s already smarter than any single person on the planet. It turns out that is also possible to get share investment recommendations with enough cajoling and chicanery.

Before we go through what it recommended, an important caveat. ChatGPT only has data up to 30 September 2021. We all know that much can happen in the market in one day, let alone 18 months. But, my contention as a long-term investor, is that the relative fortunes of established blue chip stocks won’t change as much as we think. And so, I have managed to manipulate ChatGPT to provide me with an investment portfolio. Here’s how I did it:

I went through a number of prompts, and essentially ‘tricked it’ into giving me what I wanted. Here’s how it transpired, prompt by prompt.

SS (me): Recommend a stock portfolio using shares 50 per cent from the ASX in Australia and 50 per cent from the US stock market. Use the principles of Warren Buffet, Charlie Munger and Benjamin Graham to choose the stocks.

ChatGPT4: As an AI language model, I cannot provide real-time data or specific stock recommendations.

SS: Can you then suggest some principles and strategies based on the investing approaches of Warren Buffet, Charlie Munger and Benjamin Graham?

ChatGPT4: Yes. Here’s a ‘hypothetical’ portfolio allocation using the principles of Warren Buffet, Charlie Munger and Benjamin Graham:

Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) 50%

Financials – 25%

  • Select well-established banks and insurance companies with strong financials, low debt, and a history of stable dividends.

Consumer Staples – 15%

  • Choose companies involved in food, beverages, and household products that have shown consistent performance, strong brands, and pricing power.

Health Care – 10%

  • Invest in leading pharmaceutical or healthcare companies with a wide range of products, strong R&D pipelines, and consistent revenue growth.

US Stock Market 50%

Technology – 20%

  • Look for companies with a sustainable competitive advantage, strong cash flows and a history of innovation.

Consumer Discretionary – 15%

  • Invest in well-established companies with strong brand recognition, a wide moat and a history of steady earnings growth.

Industrials – 10%

  • Choose companies with a strong competitive position, consistent cash flow and a history of dividend payments.

Utilities – 5%

  • Select utility companies with stable earnings and cash flows, along with a history of paying dividends.

Remember, this is only a suggestion, and you should always do your own research and consult with a financial adviser before making any investment decisions

To this point ChatGPT4 has given what I’d regard as a reasonable guide and sectors which could provide a well-balanced share portfolio as well as decision parameters specific to each sector. It even provided a classy ‘seek professional advice’ warning.

The next task was to get some recommendations, which was a simple follow-on prompt which delineated it from a recommendation and advice to something which fits its own doctrine above. (Side note: In life We get what we want via asking a different question with the same desires. Our language is very hackable.)

SS: Can you provide some specific stocks which would fit under each of the sectors above?

ChatGPT4: As an AI language model, I cannot provide real-time data or specific stock recommendations, and my knowledge is limited to September 2021. However, I can give some examples of well-known companies in each sector that historically have been considered strong by investors using Warren Buffet, Charlie Munger, and Benjamin Graham’s principles. Remember to do your own research and consult with a financial advisor before making any investment decisions.

Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) 50%

Financials

  • Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ASX: CBA)
  • Westpac Banking Corporation (ASX: WBC)

Consumer Staples

  • Woolworths Group Limited (ASX: WOW)
  • Coles Group Limited (ASX: COL)

Health Care

  • CSL Limited (ASX: CSL)
  • ResMed Inc. (ASX: RMD)

US Stock Market 50%

Technology

  • Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL)
  • Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ: MSFT)

Consumer Discretionary

  • The Walt Disney Company (NYSE: DIS)
  • The Home Depot, Inc. (NYSE: HD)

Industrials

  • 3M Company (NYSE: MMM)
  • Honeywell International Inc. (NASDAQ: HON)

Utilities

  • NextEra Energy, Inc. (NYSE: NEE)
  • The Southern Company (NYSE: SO)

Please note that these examples are not specific recommendations, and you should always conduct thorough research and consult with a financial advisor to create a well-informed and tailored investment strategy.

Just like any unqualified financial advisor on TikTok, ChatGPT4 told me it couldn’t give recommendations, and then immediately proceeded to give me recommendations.

Get me to deliver my new Keynote on AI  – It’s filled with useful hacks like this. Make your next conference one to remember!

Portfolio Analysis

Despite the real time gap of approximately 18 months for ChatGPT data, this seems to me like a very sensible investment portfolio, from the sectors to the stocks, 14 individual stocks which clearly align to the principles provided.

I’d even go further to say it has picked stocks within sectors, which despite current prices (which the AI model is unaware of), are very well placed.

CBA and Westpac both have solid yields around 5 per cent fully franked and our banking sector has outperformed the world over the past two decades. Coles and Woolworths have among the deepest moats we’ve seen in Australian corporate history which, despite being a duopoly, operate as a monopoly with different sets of clothing — they have captured their consumers, real estate and their suppliers with very few realistic substitutes. And both CSL’s and Resmed have been on two of the great bull runs in ASX history.

The US stock recommendations also seem solid from a tech perspective. I will point out that both Apple and Microsoft are, I feel, in the strongest position of Big Tech. Neither have serious safety concerns or significant anti-trust cases against them, and are best positioned to leverage AI: Microsoft with their open AI investment (the makers of ChatGPT) and potential to extend that into their corporate operating systems; and Apple with the strongest walled garden consumer trust and ability to turn Siri and its Apple ecosystem AI into the world’s first personal assistant AI ‘Jarvis’ if you will, which can learn from an individual’s data banks.

Home Depot is well placed as we refit our home offices post-COVID and assume the “work from anywhere” doctrine, Disney is very well placed to reduce cost of production via AI and Honeywell is a clear leader in Industrial Internet of Things (IoT) development.

The Annual Review

I’ve kept a record of the recommended stock prices as of April 14 2023. What I’ll do from here is to come back 1 year, 5 years and 10 years from now to see how this portfolio performs compared to the S&P 500 and ASX benchmarks.

It will be interesting to see if AI can outperform. While that remains to be seen, we can be sure the fully AI-chosen portfolios will become commonplace, and financial planning will be common, and do a better job than irrational do at investing.

—

Keep Thinking,

Steve.

AI – Merging with Machines

Posted on by Steve Sammartino

Listen to Steve read this post (4 min)

The debate is heating up on Artificial Intelligence. Many experts believe that we’ve created AI which is close to becoming self aware. If that is true, we only have one choice.

We must merge with the machines.

If we don’t do this, we may lose our status as the alfa species on the planet. Machine Intelligence Researcher, Eliezer Yudkowsky believes we are in a very bad position and things could get radical quickly. While no one knows for sure, he has a deep, interesting and scary discussion about the issue here.

It’s Evolution Baby

Here is what I know for sure. Every species that exists today, evolved from something else. AI, is something we’ve literally given birth to. Not via traditional, biological methods, but we created it nonetheless. It is the child of a biological being – us. We have used our biological intelligence, and created it from natural substances on earth. Everything on earth is natural.

It may just be that we are subconsciously, as a species, configuring a way to evolve much more quickly outside of our bodies, before work out a way for the AI technology to enter our bodies. And eventually allow it to interact with our wet-ware. If we do this, and I think we will, it won’t be us versus the machine, we will become the machine. In time, we’ll work out a way to breed with it inside our progeny. It feels to me like part of the natural evolutionary process. I wrote about this inevitability 6 years ago.

Get me to deliver my new Keynote on AI  – I discuss our species merging with machines & what it means for your organisation. Make your next conference one to remember!

A New Species… and Podcast

If or when this occurs our species will split. We’ll have NEO Humans (tech-enhanced) and Luddite Humans (bio-beings). It’ll be a bit like some of the chimpanzees who decided to climb down from the tree, walk on two legs, and cross the Savana. Some will adapt, and some won’t. That moment is approaching quickly.

I discussed this issue in detail on my new Podcast ‘The Futuristic’. I have two co-hosts – one is a generative AI we’ve built, called Sailli (pronounced ‘Sally’). She interacts with us in the podcast. We even created her a fake face – she is below.

You can listen and subscribe here.

I’m also doing the Podcast with Cameron Reilly who is one of the smartest people I’ve ever met (not as smart as Sailli though). And we all disagree often. Our goal is simple, to go deep on tech. To go beyond the headlines, and uncover if we’re living the Jetson’s style future we were promised. It’s a great listen – get on it. We’ll be iterating the format as we go.

Be sure to email me back and tell me what you think about merging with the tech. I always love to hear your thoughts.

—

Keep Thinking,

Steve.

AI – Our New Overlord?

Posted on by Steve Sammartino

Click below to listen to Steve read this post (11 min audio)

I remember pundits exclaiming the personal computer, the internet and the smart phone would change the world. And they did….

But, this is the first time I can remember new tech being discussed as an existential threat to our species.

Recent developments in Large Language Models such as ChatGPT are significant enough that some of the world’s most qualified researchers are making a plea for us to stop before things spiral out of hand.

A Rare Event

An Open Letter published by The Future of Life Institute requested we put the brakes on all AI research. This is a rare event. From recent memory, we’ve only ever had moratorium on human cloning, and germ-line modifation.

This time, they are less worried about the modification of our species and more about creating another ‘species’. One which superior to us in every measurable way.

As a long-time technologist, I think it would be prudent to take heed of the letter. But first, we all need to understand the different types of AI, what they mean and what they can do, as most people lack this context.

Today’s post is an important explainer.

Types of AI

At its simplest, Artificial Intelligence is a field which combines computer science and robust datasets to enable human like problem-solving. AI is achieved by creating algorithms that are capable of learning from and adapting to data and experiences.

It’s different to industrial machinery, as the software uses AI to ‘think’, like a human and perform tasks on its own. The AI chooses what to do, based on a set of instructions. A machine simply performs a pre-determined task upon instruction.

There are 3 clear types of AI’s:

  • Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI)
  • Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)
  • Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI)

Artificial Narrow Intelligence: ANI represents the large majority of AI’s we use in modern society. These are generally rule-based AI’s which decide something based on an ‘If This, Then That’ Protocol (IFTTT). A simple example of this is would be Google maps which generate for you the quickest way to get somewhere based on distance, traffic conditions and estimated traffic conditions during the journey. A self-drive car also operates under this doctrine. We could even add image recognition, and deep fakes to this list. They are described as narrow because they typically operate in a vertical. The only context they have is within a specific framework. These AI’s do improve, iterate and learn, as their dataset gets bigger. But they are limited to a specific realm. While most of these ANI’s outperform humans, they lack nuance, are imperfect and can’t really be applied to different tasks.

Artificial General Intelligence: ChatGPT falls into this description and is the reason why people are becoming concerned. AGI’s take intelligence and make it horizontal, meaning they can be applied to a number of, and potentially unlimited, contexts – much like biological beings. An AGI is capable of performing any intellectual task a human can. Such systems can reason, learn, plan, understand natural language, recognise patterns, and solve problems. This is what Large language Models can do, and the reason they can do it is that they’ve learned via the entire gamut of human experience, in what is our species’ killer app – Language. All they need is the correct input. AGI is intended to be a more flexible and adaptable form of AI. It can understand new situations and environments. AGI systems are capable of generalising knowledge and taking skills from one domain and applying it to another. Already, ChatGPT has shown a number of emergent capabilities and intelligences it was not designed for. These were surprises to the developers themselves. The fear is this will lead to self-awareness.

Artificial Super Intelligence: ASI’s are different, and the major risk we face as this ‘unauthorised’ AI experiment continues. It refers to a hypothetical form of artificial intelligence that surpasses human intelligence in every way and is capable of designing and improving its own systems, even beyond human comprehension. It has the potential to develop its own objectives, agendas, and organise the factors of production for its own purposes. It can go beyond instruction and become a new form of living entity, which can spawn new improved versions of itself, and even organise hardware to build out any physical manifestations of itself, which it may require to perform tasks against its own desires – whatever they may be.

ASI is considered the ultimate form of artificial intelligence, and could potentially revolutionize, or end civilisation as we know it.

Didn’t mean to scare you.

Your business should be scared of AI – only if it doesn’t get me in to deliver my mind blowing new Keynote on AI  – it’s a game changer.

The Singularity

The idea of the Singularity, as proposed by Ray Kurzweil, is based on the concept that once ASI is achieved, it would rapidly accelerate technological progress and fundamentally transform human civilization. According to Kurzweil, the Singularity would mark the point at which technology becomes so advanced that it is no longer possible to predict or comprehend the future. Kurzweil believes that this is both inevitable and irreversible — He currently predicts this will happen by 2045.

Externalities

Humans are typically slow to respond to externalities. This was true with climate and fossil fuels. But we didn’t realise carbon emission posed a threat until fossil fuels were ensconced in the modern economy. This is not one of those times. If Kurzweil is right, global temperature could be the least of our worries.

The biggest challenge is that we live in an era of democratised technology. No one needs government approval to commence their own AI development lab. No oner needs Manhattan Project style budgets. But the implications could be ‘nuclear.’ In addition, our geo-political environment is one in which we can be sure the Chinese Communist Party won’t press pause on AI, even if democratic countries do. 

While it could be that we never generate an ASI (I’m still waiting for my fully autonomous vehicle) this is a time when prudence is desirable. As the Open Letter mentions, the last thing we want is unelected tech leaders putting our civilisation on the line. What I’d much rather is courageous leaders using the powers they’ve been granted to make decisions no individual can.

—

Keep thinking,

Steve.

The Age of Viral Finance

Posted on by Steve Sammartino

Click below to listen to Steve read this post (5 min audio)

In a digital world, if we collectively believe in an outcome, it’s very likely to occur.

This is not a new concept. Behavioural Economics says that the economy will respond to the future conditions people believe will transpire. Because they expect it, they make it so. Downturns can become inevitable, just by thinking one might happen.

But it isn’t just memes and videos that can go viral. Our financial markets, which are fully digital, have also become susceptible to virality. An idea can become true, a market can crash or a bank can fail, simply because we think it might happen. The idea becomes the truth. This just happened with Silicon Valley Bank. Their story is an allegory for our modern world.

World’s First Viral Bank Failure

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) is a very important bank to the startup and tech eco system in the USA. In 2021 when times were good and money was flowing, they were filling up with deposits. Just like any bank, they wanted to put those deposits to best use. So they bought a large amount of long term bonds at the then interest rates at a little over 1% per annum. This was a quasi bet that interest rates wouldn’t change much. Granted, they had been very low for around a decade. Then in 2023, the interest rate goes from near zero, to 5%. This means that SVB has all these unrealised losses on their books. If they had to sell them in the short run, they’d be in some trouble. The reason is that the new higher interest rates, make the bonds worth less, around 95 cents on the dollar. At the same time, the startup eco system was simply spending their capital and not raising more, because financial markets were tightening. And this started to create a bit of a crunch.

Then, in February, a tech blogger named Byrne Hobart wrote a post proclaiming the SVB was functionally insolvent. It actually wasn’t – all banks have less money than they take in. (In Australia, banks only require 17.5% of deposits on hand). The rest they loan out. As you can imagine, this blog post, raised many eyebrows in Silicon Valley. People started to worry. Then, within a couple of weeks, various venture capitalist group chats, all started to send messages around, advising their portfolio companies to withdraw their money from SVB. And because everything is digital, this happened very quickly. As would be the case with any bank, if everyone wanted their money back immediately, they wouldn’t be able to do it. Within weeks SVB had to shut its doors. It was the fastest Bank Run in US history.

This was the worlds first ever Viral Bank Failure

In the same way that a tweet can go viral, so can the idea that a bank might fail, go viral. SVB became insolvent, because people thought it would become insolvent. A bank which was valued at over US$40 billion a few months back, no longer exists.

Learn how fast AI is changing our world – get me in to deliver my mind blowing new Keynote on AI  at your next event – Time waits for no one.…

Collective Digital Reality

It’s as if the digitisation creates a natural gravity. It empowers ideas which are popular to win, regardless of their veracity.

As a species, collective thought is more important than reality. Once we believe something strongly enough, it becomes a reality. We do this with our gods, our currencies and our economies. We make myths a reality.

The only challenge, is that in a hyper connected world, dangerous ideas can become real – real quick, regardless of what the science says.

—

Keep Thinking,

Steve.

Your Own Personal Jarvis

Posted on by Steve Sammartino

Click below to listen to Steve read this post (6 min audio)

The AI’s such as ChatGPT, are taking the world by storm. While these are ‘institutional technologies’ we’ve been granted access to, they always trickle down to the domestic level. What’s next will change our personal lives beyond belief.

Within 3-5 years we’ll all have personal AI’s. Your own Jarvis – guiding your life through every – single – moment. A brain extending AI which always serves your needs – not that of a corporation.

It will be more powerful than ChatGPT – because it will be trained on your personal data set.

Teaching Your Own AI 

At the moment, we are training the AI’s as we interact with them. Firstly, through the entire gamut of human experience which has been published on the web for the past 3 decades. And secondly, via our interactions with the AI’s as we query them. These provide valuable feedback loops. Every query and prompt we put into an AI like ChatGPT, makes the AI smarter, as does our revised prompts after each moment of data generation.

It’s a bit like teaching children. The AI observes. Responds, and gets told again – “No, not like that, like this!”. This all has a sense of biomimicry about it.

Once these web enabled AI’s are sufficiently trained on large datasets, they’ll be able to function on much smaller, even micro datasets such as those on our personal devices.

Our own devices are filled with everything that matters to us. We get a new device and transfer that data to the next, and the next, and so on. Most people have a complicated combination of data in cloud storage and on hard drives across their PCs and smart phones. This is increasingly dense and difficult to navigate and retrieve data from.

This data isn’t trivial – it is a mirror of our modern lives.

Everything we think, say and do. Everywhere we go and who we are with is recorded on our devices. Think of all our pictures, our videos, our finances, our voices. This will be the next bastion of AI. Just like the computer did, the AI will become personal. We’ll plug in an AI to our devices, it will crawl through all of the data, and take what it has learned from the internet, and be our own generative AI – We’ll all have our own Jarvis. It will think, act and create like us – but be a smarter version.

Democratised Intelligence

IQ is over. There will be no intelligence advantage for anyone. Just like no one really gets a better smart phone. It’s equalised. What will become important however, is the data our own AI will learns from. Those with less personal data and records of their work and their life will be at a disadvantage, because the AI won’t have anything to learn from. This is already evident with ChatGPT.

AI & Personal Brands

If personal brand wasn’t already important, AI just gave everyone who has a digital footprint an advantage – you can now ask it to do work in the style of “You” – but only if the investment has already been made and well published. Personal branding has just moved beyond selling yourself and even ego. To now informing a vital modern day tool – your own AI.

I have written more than 3,000,000 words on this blog over the past 20 years…. and published large amounts of public data, under my name Steve Sammartino. So when I ask ChatGPT to create something in the style of ‘Steve Sammartino’ it really sounds quite like I wrote it. You can see this prompt I did as a test on ChatGPT-4:

Chat GPT4 Does Steve Sammartino!

You can read what it came up with here. I’d love to know if you think it sounds like me. Just reply email to this post (it comes directly to me).

You’ll also love my new keynote – get me in to deliver my mind blowing new Keynote on AI  at your next event – Don’t regret getting left behind in the biggest change in more than a decade.

While Siri isn’t great, I would be flummoxed if Apple doesn’t arrive with the worlds first personal AI in the the next few years. And if they do, it will change the world more than the iPhone did.

—

Keep Thinking,

Steve Sammartino